TaxTooter Logo
TaxTooterFaceless Consultancy Platform under Self Assessment Mode
Repository

Primary Law

๐Ÿ“œGST Acts๐Ÿ›๏ธCustoms Acts๐Ÿ“‹GST Rules๐Ÿ“‹Customs Rules

Subordinate Law

๐Ÿ””GST Notifications๐Ÿ””Customs Notifications๐Ÿ“ŒCirculars & Instructions๐Ÿ“ขPress Releases & FAQs

Rulings & Judgments

โš–๏ธAdvance Rulings๐Ÿ›๏ธSupreme Court๐Ÿ›๏ธHigh Courtsโš–๏ธGSTATโš–๏ธCESTAT
View all 13 categories โ†’
Donate
Repository

Primary Law

๐Ÿ“œGST Acts๐Ÿ›๏ธCustoms Acts๐Ÿ“‹GST Rules๐Ÿ“‹Customs Rules

Subordinate Law

๐Ÿ””GST Notifications๐Ÿ””Customs Notifications๐Ÿ“ŒCirculars & Instructions๐Ÿ“ขPress Releases & FAQs

Rulings & Judgments

โš–๏ธAdvance Rulings๐Ÿ›๏ธSupreme Court๐Ÿ›๏ธHigh Courtsโš–๏ธGSTATโš–๏ธCESTAT
View all 13 categories โ†’
Donate
Repository/Supreme Court/NALIN CHOKSEY v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, KOCHI
S.L.P. (C) No. 16123 of 2018

NALIN CHOKSEY v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, KOCHI

Supreme Court
Date Issued
27 November 2024
Source
2025 (391) E.L.T. 163 (S.C.)
Views
11

Summary

Importer - Car owner v. Original importer - Alleged deliberate misdeclaration of imported car model and chassis number for under invoicing/valuation to evade Customs duty - Import of impugned car was not prohibited and its registration certificate had continued in its importerโ€™s name - Car was seized from possession of subsequent purchaser from person who had purchased it from importer, and show cause notice issued to him - Tribunal held that bona fide subsequent purchaser was not liable as he had no role in car import or misdeclaration or in any offence connected with import - High Court held that subsequent purchaser was liable for Customs duty as he had exercised redemption option - HELD : Original importer was car owner as its registration certificate continued to be in his name - Even though there was transfer of car from importer, law did not recognize ownership of subsequent purchaser whose name was not in registration certificate in terms of definition of owner under Section 2(30) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Car was not imported for his benefit or on his behalf, and he was not liable to pay Customs duty as he was neither importer nor involved in process of car import - Asโ€ฆ

Tags

GSTJudgmentSupreme Court
Download PDF

Need expert guidance?

Our retired tax officers can help you interpret this and apply it to your situation.

Ask an Expert โ€” Pay What You Want
TaxTooter

India's free indirect tax repository + Pay What You Want consultation by retired GST & Customs officers.

Repository

  • GST Acts
  • Customs Acts
  • GST Rules
  • GST Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Advance Rulings
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
  • All 13 categories โ†’

Consultation

  • Ask an Expert
  • My Queries
  • Dashboard

Platform

  • Blog
  • Support Us
  • GST Act (Quick Ref)
  • GST Rules (Quick Ref)

ยฉ 2026 TaxTooter. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed are those of the individual expert officer and do not represent any government department.